The Psycopathic Mental and Personality Disordr of Charles Manson

Published: 2021-06-26 22:45:05
essay essay

Category: Psychology

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

The Psycotic and Abstract How we live our childhood and grow up can have an impact on adult years and determine how our minds are in regards to right and wrong. Charles Manson lived a terrible child hood, and no child should have to go through what he went through. This does not excuse what we do wrong, morally or unlawfully in our adult years, but can have a terrible impact on the mind. The schools for crime causation will help to try to understand Charles Manson, his childhood, adult live, and life of crime. Charles Manson Charles Manson was not any ordinary man.
He did not have a happy child hood, even in his teen years, and most of his life has been spent incarcerated. The schools of crime causation and some of their theories will analyze Charles Manson from his childhood to his life of crime to see what made Manson turn to one of the most notorious serial killers of all time. These theories of crime causation are biological, physical, and social theories. The psychological school of crime causation calls a psychopath a person who has a mental disorder or personality disorder. Charles Manson had a combination of both; a true psychopath. Henry Cleckley described the psychopath, also called a sociopath, as a ‘moral idiot’ whose central defining characteristics is the inability to accurately imagine how other think and feel” (Schmalleger, 2007, p. 95). Charles Manson did not care how others felt or what they thought. He was brought up in a world where he knew his mother did not care about his feelings as long as she met her needs. Charles Manson could, if he wanted to, inflict so much pain on his victims and never care about the amount of suffering they would be going through.
He was quoted as saying to “a television reporter, ‘I could take this book and beat you to death with it, and I wouldn’t feel a thing. It’d be just like walking to the drug store” (Schmalleger, 2007, p. 95). Charles Manson was not only a psychopath, but he was also a psychotic. He was out of touch with the reality that he lived in. Manson believed that the end of the world would come and he would rule the world with his family behind him. “Manson believed that Armageddon was imminent, in the form of a race war, and believed he was destined to be the ultimate beneficiary of it.
He also described the race war as Helter Skelter, ‘all the wars that have ever been fought, piled on top of each other” (The Family: Charles Manson, n. d. , p. 2). What Manson meant was that the war would ultimately be between the blacks and whites. Manson felt that the blacks were not educated enough to run the country, and they also did not know how to begin the war. Charles “Manson was heard saying that the war would be triggered by ‘some black people coming out of the ghetto and doing atrocious crimes, and that blacks did not know how to start its rule in this war, so he would have to show them” (The Family; Charles Manson, n. . , p. 2). Manson also believed that there was a hole in the desert where he and his followers could hide in the earth until Armageddon was over with. This hole led to the bottomless pit lined with gold streets. The psychopath came out of Manson when the first murder was committed, but the murder of Sharon Tate was horrendous. Sharon Take was an actress who was “stabbed five times, which was fatal, but she also had another eleven stab wounds. Ms. Tate was pregnant, and Charles Manson had no moral values when it came to life. Ms. Tate and her child were killed and the child was cut out of the actress’ womb. Charles Manson claimed to have committed 35 murders” (Charles Manson, n. d. , p. 2), so there are others that have not been accounted for that should be charged to Manson, or maybe it was a figment of Manson’s imagination. Then again, maybe Sigmund Freud (Schmalleger, 2007) and his Freudian Psychoanalysis does make a vital point in Charles Manson’s life. The Freudian Psychoanalysis explains the “id, ego, and superego within the personality” (Schmalleger, 2007, p. 93). What this means is that the sexual drive is stimulated by the id.
The ego carries out those drives, and “relates desires to practical behavioral alternatives, and the superego determines the standards of right and wrong acquired by the personality” (Schmalleger, 2007, p. 93). This relates to Charles Manson because he could only see past his needs and interests. “People who lack fully developed superegos are often called psychopaths or sociopaths to indicate that they cannot see beyond their own interests” (Schmalleger, 2007, p. 93). Manson had a plan and he was determined to see it through. Again, this comes down to the psychopath in Manson. It al leads back to Armageddon and not living in the real world.
The main purpose for Charles Manson and the Family to do the gruesome murders was because of his plans to inherit the earth as the world ruler. Charles Manson was a smart man. Although his child hood was too horrible for any child to go through, Manson had enough sense to create a plan to start the next world war, that he studied Scientology and hypnosis. “Charles Manson, having grown up in reform schools and penitentiaries, was trained by professional criminal minds” (Lerma, 2006, p. 1). Manson realized that he could use scientology to his advantage, so he studied it and found a useful weapon.
According to Arnie Lerma, (2006): What cannot be debated is that there was something in Scientology that a serial killer criminal mind found very appealing, useful…it was a TOOL that empowered him, that provided the means, making him capable of not just being a lone monster like The Son of Sam, Jeffery Dahlmer, but one who was able to mold a group that would follow his every instruction and Go out and do exactly what he had told them to do. And they did! ” (2006, p. 1). Lerma was right. Charles Manson learned the techniques of scientology along with L.
Ron Hubbard’s (Lerma, 2006) techniques to brain wash his followers to do anything he told them to do. L Ron Hubbard wrote “A very effective thought control technique could also be worked out from Scientology, which could be used to make individuals into willing slaves” (Lerma, 2006). Charles Manson had a trouble youth and ended up spending his young adult life incarcerated. “Manson drifted, had a troubled youth-an illegitimate child, he bounced from town to town, engaging in a haphazard string of petty crimes and larcenous acts, spending seventeen of his first thirty-two years in jails and prisons” (Lerma, 2006, p. ). Manson was not a violent person, but had offenses such as “burglary, car theft, forgery, and pimp” (Lerma, 2006, p. 4). A psychotic mind can be very smart. So smart as to learn scientology, hypnotize his followers, and plan dooms day, while in prison. But, psychology only takes a look at the personality and thinking of Charles Manson, but his upbringing is part of the main factors of his actions. This is where the sociological school of crime causation takes over. The sociological theories of crime causation mainly focus on Manson being a product of his environment.
To take a look at some of these theories of crime causation, one must take a look at the child hood of Charles Manson. First, Charles Manson was born to a prostitute who stayed in jail and Charles was bounced around the family. His grandmother was very religious and Manson learned Christian meekness. Next, he lived with his aunt and uncle “where he was forced by his uncle to unlearn the grandmother’s teachings in order to become a ‘man’. To help him, he was sent to school dressed as a girl” (Sama, 2008). In between time spent in jail, Manson lived with his mother.
One day Manson’s mother sold him to a waitress for a pitcher of beer. The waitress could not have children and asked Manson’s mother to name her price for him. Manson’s “Mom replied, ‘a pitcher of beer, and he’s yours” (Bardsley, n. d. ). Manson’s uncle found the waitress and got him back. After Charles Manson was taught how to drink by his uncle, he was already in a life of crime. “At age 14, he was in the Indiana School for Boys, where he was beaten and sexually abused by guards and fellow inmates” (Sama, 2008). Manson escaped, but was recaptured.
When he was released, Manson “was immune to whatever he was beaten with, and he was just in time for the hippie revolution, LSD, and hordes of outcasts just like himself” (Sama, 2008). The brief history of Charles Manson’s child hood is part of the social disorganization theory, the social learning, and social development can be analyzed. The social learning theory of crime causation is “a psychological perspective that says that people learn how to behave by modeling themselves after other whom they have the opportunity to observe” (Schmalleger, 2007, p. 102).
Charles Manson became cold, heartless, and a loner by watching how his mother treated him. It was also the other family members who made him feel nothing inside but resentment, hatred and anger. The reform schools and prisons made Charles Manson into a fighter in defense. But, the best teachers of all were the professional criminal minds that Manson observed on a regular basis. They inspired Manson to learn Scientology, which was Manson’s most powerful weapon on his brutal killing spree. The social development theory also describes “the process of interaction between individuals and society as the root cause of crime” (Schmalleger, 2007, p. 04). This theory of social development describes Manson’s child hood and how he lived a life of rejection everyday. Manson was never loved as a child, never really bonded with his mother, was beaten and mistreated by family and strangers, and he was degraded by his uncle. Psychological and sociological problems faced Charles Manson before he ever had a chance in the world. It is hard to figure out what criminal minds think, what sparked them to commit crimes, and all the individual factors that help to contribute to such an act.
Charles Manson had a rough life, but schools for crime causation can analyze Manson to try to figure out what makes him tick. The psychological theories of crime causation discuss the mental and personality disorders that Charles Manson may have, labeling Manson as a psychopath and psychotic. Even Freudian Psychoanalysis can explain how Manson’s ego and superego could have sent him into a life of crime. Manson learned scientology from watching the professionals who studied and analyzed him. Then he proceeded to gather his followers during the hippie revolution.
In the sociological theories of crime causation, Manson’s child hood was laid out in the social disorganization theory. The social learning theory gave Manson his chance to change for the worst by analyzing those who analyzed him, and learning the trade, and the social development theory shows how Manson never bonded with his mother and others. Charles Manson had a lot of circumstances that could have made him mentally troubled, but he was a very smart serial killer who had a plan, but was stopped before his plan slaughtered more people. References Bardsley, M. (n. d. ). Charles Manson and the Manson family.
Retrieved November 21, 2008, from http://www. trutv. com/library/crime/serial_killer/notorious/manson/murder_1. html Lerma, A. (2006). Charles Manson was a scientologist. Retrieved November 21, 2008, from http://lermanet. com/scientologyscandals/charlesmanson. htm Sama, K. (2008). Charles Manson. Retrieved November 22, 2008, from http://www. geocities. com/koneko-sama/cmanson. html Schmalleger, F. (2007). Criminal justice today (9th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson- Prentice Hall. The Family: Charles Manson. (n. a. ). (n. d. ). Retrieved November 22, 2008, from http://www. religioustolerance. org/dc_charl. htm

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read