The two beginnings that will be used will be analyzed harmonizing to its beginning, intent, restrictions and value.
Summary of Evidence
The on-line article “ What Was Peopling Power? ” states that the revolution was a non-violent motion of united Filipino citizens. They were lead by Corazon “ Cory ” Aquino, the married woman of Benigno Aquino, a prima opposition of the regulation of President Ferdinand Marcos, an advocator for the resistance of their Nationalist Party. This motion was a success because it led to the overthrow of Ferdinand Marcos. After the overthrow, Corazon Aquino won presidential term.
Ferdinand Marcos was a corrupt leader. He was president of the Philippines for twenty old ages ( for two footings ) , from 1965 to 1986.[ 1 ]After World War II, Ferdinand Marcos emerged from World War II with the repute of being the greatest Filipino opposition leader of the war and the most adorned soldier in the U.S. Armed forces.[ 2 ]Before being president of the Philippines, Marcos had been the leader of the Ang Maharlika. The Ang Maharlika was a secret opposition that Ferdinand Marcos had created. It was said that this secret opposition was made up of undercover agents and revolutionists ( bravos ) , in really, the opposition consisted of forgers, stealers, and gunslingers. The Ang Maharlika was a guerrilla force in northern Luzon. As president Marcos excelled in accomplishing substructure development along with international diplomatic negotiations ; nevertheless despite these great accomplishments he, along with his disposal, was highly autocratic, corrupt ; they were besides politically inhibitory, and they besides violated human rights.
In 1983, Benigno Aquino Jr. , a senator and governor of Tarlac who opposed Marcos, was assassinated due to a gunfire to his caput. President Marcos, along with the remainder of his authorities, was involved in the blackwash. This blackwash became the accelerator of the People Power Revolution. From 1972 up through 1981, Marcos ‘ authorities passed a soldierly jurisprudence that repressed the people ‘s freedom. He claimed that it was to make “ New Society ” based on new societal and political value. Despite the jurisprudence ‘s success in cut downing offense, it frightened any political oppositions doing them to travel into expatriate. The same goes for the remainder of the people. They could non hold a say in anything. Thingss were about to alter for the better one time Ferdinand Marcos was exiled.
After the revolution, Corazon Aquino ‘s presidential term was the start of democracy for the Filipinos. The new authorities, the Constitutional Commission gave them a new fundamental law. It was ratified on February 2, 1987. The Constitution so went into consequence on the eleventh of that month. It diminished presidential powers from declaring soldierly jurisprudence. The Constitution besides restored the bicameral Congress.
Evaluation of Beginnings
The beginning Mercado ‘s A People Power: The Filipino Revolution of 1986: An Eyewitness History was written by Monina Mercado. It tells the narrative of the revolution that exiled Ferdinand Marcos from power through a aggregation of assorted narratives by many different people told in their ain words. It was published in 1987 doing it slightly of a believable beginning. This is said because it was written after, if non during, the revolution. This means that it contained existent, current information. On the other manus, being published so shortly after the revolution had occurred agencies that it will non hold all the necessary information. If it was to depict the effects of the People ‘s Power Revolution, it would merely advert the effects that occurred merely between that annual clip period. It would non embrace the effects over 10 or twenty old ages. It appears that the intent of the beginning is to inform readers about the Filipino Revolution of 1986 and her point of position on the state of affairs. A People Power: The Filipino Revolution of 1986: An Eyewitness History is limited because it is biased. The writer is clearly a protagonist of Corazon Aquino. She does non compose about what the people on the other side of the revolution idea. The beginning ‘s value is questionable. It does its intent and informs readers of the revolution and it does sheds visible radiation on the events which toppled the Marcos absolutism.
The 2nd beginning is The Filipino Revolution of 1986: Ordinary Lifes in Extraordinary Times was published in 2001, doing it a valuable beginning. This book is the most recent resource out of both of the beginnings. It was written by Florentino Rodao. The writer of this book goes into item about “ gender and ethnicity during the Revolution ; corruptness in the second-half of the 19th century ; the circuitions “ intra-Asian trade ” ; the inflow of refugees to Cavite, which affected the competition between Bonifacio and Aguinaldo ; the parturiencies of the Franciscan mendicants ; and the hopes and frights of a Spanish soldier as seen through his letters. ” The intent of this book was to depict the clip in which they were ruled by the Spanish and when they were freed. With this being said, this was non a really valuable book for this probe. It does non wholly speak about the issue at manus, the People Power Revolution ; therefore restricting this book much more. It does non travel into deepness about the revolution, instead the clip before it. In a sense, this book is valuable because it gives background information on how the people were before the revolution, hence leting for a comparing to be made between the clip periods.
Every individual sort of revolution brings about alteration. The Filipino Revolution, in this instance brought about a positive alteration. After 1986, there were many more societal and governmental alterations. The Filipino Revolution brought approximately great societal alterations. The people were non to be socially repressed any more. Peoples could talk their head without acquiring reprimanded. The revolution, along with all other revolutions, was a clip of military and political battle for power. This exhaustively affected the people. Even before the People ‘s Power Revolution Filipinos had been military and socially repressed because of the Spanish. After deriving their freedom, they had small clip to be their ain ; to be free, even if it was merely for a small piece. They were non technically used to holding such freedom, so when Marcos became president at that place was non much opposition. With all the alterations being made throughout the Philippines, it is non flooring that, socially, the state changed. This comes to demo, why there was non opposition to Ferdinand Marcos in the beginning.
While the Filipino revolution overthrew such a powerful, despotic leader, it left much of the old centralised power construction unchanged. The U.S. still retained major influence through military assistance and bases. The Filipino military remained integral under Defense Minister Enrile, the same adult male who had gotten rich from political connexions while functioning as Defense Minister under Marcos. The new President, Corazon Aquino, was from a affluent household. The hapless were still hapless, and the rich were still in charge.
The Filipino revolution demonstrates what the power people can hold when they unite and “ withdraw consent. ” The same kineticss apply, no affair what the issue. If Filipinos had decided to travel on and battle and battle for a more merely division of wealth, the abolishment of the military, and/ or a decentralised authorities that was more antiphonal to their demands, who knows what more astonishing things they might hold achieved.
To reason, there were societal and governmental alterations as a consequence of the Filipino Revolution. After Marcos was exiled, there was much more societal freedom. Political leaders could really talk their head and exiled. The people were given the right to voice their sentiments and non be punished. What changed drastically was the authorities. The Philippines came from being an autocratic province to a bicameral democratic state. The People Power Revolution of 1986 signified the integrity of the civilians and how they came to the assistance of the armed forces, which had long been an instrument of repression and panic.
BookRags Staff. 2005. “ Ferdinand Marcos. ” [ Available Online ] [ cited September 12, 2010 ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bookrags.com/biography/ferdinand-marcos/ .
Dizon, Regina G. Mount Holyoke College. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.mtholyoke.edu/~rgdizon/classweb/worldpolitics/main.html ( 27 January 2010 )
“ Peoples Power in the Philippines. ” hypertext transfer protocol: //www.fragmentsweb.org/TXT2/philiptx.html.
In Defense of Marxism. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.marxist.com/perspectives-philippine-revolution080487.htm ( 30 January 2010 )
Kabayan Central. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.kabayancentral.com/book/ateneo/mb5503861.html.
Mercado, Monina A. People Power: The Filipino Revolution of 1986: An Eyewitness History. Manila: James B. Reuter, S.J. Foundation.
Morrow, Paul. Maharlika and the ancient category system. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.pilipino-express.com/history a-culture/in-other-words/251-maharlika-and-the-ancient-class-system.html ( accessed 2010 ) .
Onwar.com. “ USA Spain Philippine Revolution. ” hypertext transfer protocol: //www.onwar.com/aced/data/Philippines1986.htm. ( 2 February 2010 )
Rodao, Florentino, and Felice N. Rodiguez. The Filipino Revolution of 1986: Ordinary Lifes in Extraordinary Times. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press.